Economic and Labour Market Update - Novemeber 2009
In this month’s Update:
- New industry-specific data on how the region has been affected by the recession
- Latest labour force participation stats
- Auckland and income inequality
1. Introduction
The economic climate this month seems to be one of muted optimism, with the upturn in economic growth seen as tentative, given that it is not traditional export-led growth. Many commentators are cautious over the economic recovery and are intensely monitoring changes within the economy.
Two significant sets of indicators providing a snapshot of the impact of the recession on the region’s businesses were released: Business Demography Statistics for February 2009, and the Household Labour Force Survey for the September 2009 quarter. | |
This month saw Auckland hosting a number of public seminars and lectures on the economy, creating new dialogue and critical thinking about our economic fundamentals. |
2. Business Demography Statistics for Auckland
At February 2009, the Auckland region had 161,104 geographic units (31% of New Zealand’s total). This was a 0.5% increase from February 2008 for the region, marginally higher than the 0.3% increase in geographic units nationally.
| | Although there was relatively little overall change in the number of business units, there was significant change to some industries. For example, in the category of ‘property operators and real estate services’, there was a massive increase in residential property operators1, (up 1,111 units, or 13%), while real estate services declined by 16% (761 enterprises) and non-residential property operators declined by 394 enterprises (down 2%). |
Overall, the construction industry was down 490 business units, or 2.8%, with non-residential property operators showing the biggest decline (down 394 business units) followed by house construction (4% or 193 business units), and other construction sector categories showing marginal increases. | |
Other increases of note were in the financial and insurance services sector (up 490 or 3.9%), and the professional, scientific and technical services (up 425 or 1.9%). | |
At February 2009, there were an estimated 621,400 employees in the region, down 3.6% from February 2008. The industries with the largest decreases in employee numbers were administrative and support services (down 5,200 or 13.5%), manufacturing (down 5,100 or 6.3%) and retail trade (down 4,800 or 7.3%). Table 1. Selected Auckland industries with most signficant changes between 2008 and 2009
|
3. Auckland’s Quarterly Labour Force Statistics
Statistics New Zealand’s quarterly Household Labour Force Survey (HLFS) provides an overview of aspects of labour force participation. For the Auckland region, this report has a particular focus on trends across age and ethnic groups2. Some highlights from the data (between year ended Sept 2008 and Sept 2009) include:
| | - A drop in the number employed |
| Table 2 shows the key headline figures for Auckland’s labour force status, at September 2009. There was a drop of 19,800 people employed in the region for the year ended September 2009, wtih 13,300 more people unemployed than at September 2008 (an increase from 4.3% to 6.2%). Table 2. Labour force status for September 2008 and 2009 (annual averages)
|
| The unemployment rates by age group shows stark differences by cohort. While youth unemployment is traditionally higher than older age groups, the rate of unemployment for under 25s is rising at a greater rate than for other age cohorts (Figure 1). Figure 1. Auckland’s unemployment rate by age
|
Table 3 shows the unemployment rates among ethnic groups, with the highest rate, (and greatest annual rise) in unemployment amongst Pacific peoples (12.5%), followed closely by Mäori (11.6%). Europeans had the lowest unemployment rate (4.5%) of the ethnic groupings. Table 3. Unemployment rates amongst various groups
| |
There was little change in the relative rates of unemployment by gender, with a 6.4% rate for women, and 6.1% rate for men. | |
Commentators point out that changes in the labour market tend to lag behind changes in the economy – what the statistics tell us now reflects what the economy was doing a few months or quarters ago. Economic changes are slower to affect the labour markets as when spending in the economy weakens, businesses do not make people redundant straight away. Given that it costs a lot to find new staff and train them up, and that the most recent experience of employers was one of great difficulty in finding staff during a sustained period of low unemployment, Alexander3 comments that ‘the bulk of 2008 was characterised by businesses hoarding people waiting for the late-2008 upturn’. He also comments that the rising unemployment rate suggests wage rise restraint, and speculates that the NZ Reserve Bank is unlikely to raise the cash rate soon. |
4. Economic Seminars
The universities of Auckland have hosted some interesting economic debates and discussions over the last month, forcing a dialogue on the current economic climate, the international neo-liberal economic framework and a revisit of the ‘bigger picture’ within which the Auckland economy operates.
| Rod Oram and Jane Kelsey both presented on “The future of the global economy” as part of Motu’s Auckland Public Policy Seminar series4. Oram presented some sobering figures from the global and domestic economy, such as world trade falling by 10% this year, New Zealand households being the second most indebted internationally after Iceland, and United States household consumption being 40% of world GDP. He cautioned the optimism surrounding economic recovery in New Zealand, but was more optimistic about longer term projections, as demand shifts from consumer to capital goods, with new and better technologies – a shift from debt to equity. | |
| Kelsey was pessimistic about the future of the global economy, seeing it as marked by instability and uncertainty. She warned against short term horizons, and ignoring the systemic nature of the crises we are currently experiencing. Both presenters foresee an end to the neo-liberal economic framework, but were not prescriptive about what would replace it. | |
The Bruce Jesson 2009 lecture delivered by Professor Robert Wade of the London School of Economics was entitled ‘how to stop the moneymen from taking over the world’, and the main thrust of his presentation was to question how one sector, financial services - analogous to infrastructure – could come to dominate and become so capital mobile? He termed this ‘financialisation’ of the (American) economic order, caused by a failure of national regulation, with financial markets self-regulating and the interests of Wall St and the US national interest being inextricably aligned. Wade also explored the parallels between the great depression of the 1920s and the current global credit crisis. He stressed the increasing levels of income inequality as a contributing factor. He argued that economists have paid little attention to income inequality over the last year. | |
Auckland’s income distribution has been measured as part of the Genuine Progress Indicator5 for the period 1989 to 2006 and shows rising levels of inequality in the Auckland region. The Auckland Gini coefficient showed a range of between 0.342 and 0.392. The Gini co-efficient is a measure of the distribution of income among quintiles of the population. It ranges between 0 and 1, where a coefficient of 0 means income is equally spread, and a coefficient of 1 means all income is held by a single quintile. A healthy and dynamic economy typically shows a Gini coefficient of between 0.22 and 0.35. | |
Massey University also hosted Arthur Sweetman of Queens University, Ontario, who gave a seminar on ‘The impacts of immigration on the receiving economy’. His conclusion, based mainly from empirical work in Canada, was that the evidence does not currently appear to support there being either large economic benefits or costs arising from immigration. However, the evidence on impacts is very controversial. Sweetman posits that there is likely to be a broad distribution of effects with different sets of individuals experiencing different impacts. More empirical work from Auckland could enlighten the local impacts here, given that Auckland has had high rates of both domestic and international (inward) migration. |
5. Conclusion
Monitoring of the Auckland, national and global economies continue, amid emerging debate about the overall structure of the global economic system. Signs of recovery are accepted with caution, given the effects in the real economy are yet to be realised. The neo-liberal economic order resulted in a global credit crisis. How economies recover will determine whether there is a return to a modified business as usual, or whether a new architecture of the international economic order emerges, with a significant break from the economic structure of the last 40 years.
By Dr. Catherine Murray and Alison Reid
2.Quarterly Auckland regional labour market reports are also prepared by the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) and the Department of Labour (DoL). http://www.dol.govt.nz/publications/lmr/regional/joint/lmr-regional-akl.asp
3.Tony Alexander (BNZ) BNZ Weekly Overview. 5th November 2009
4.http://www.motu.org.nz/building-capacity/detail/auckland_seminars
5.McDonald, G., Forgie, V., Zhang, J. Andrew, R. and Smith, N. (2009) A Genuine Progress Indicator for the Auckland region – Valuation Methodology. Prepared by the New Zealand Centre for Ecological Economics and Market Economics for the Auckland Regional Council. Auckland Regional Council. Technical Report 2009/101
Information Community Login
Previous economic updates:
